JAMES KNOESS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES KNOESS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
106 So. 3d 509
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).
POLEN, GROSS, JJ., and STONE, BARRY J., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Margarito Curiel Aguirre v. State, 159 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…at were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing. Such fines, pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes (2012), cannot be announced as part of a lump sum, as was done below, but must be specifically pronounced. See, e.g., Coates v. State, 106 So. 3d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Keel v. State, 134 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012): On remand, the trial court may reimpose the fine and surcharge after following the proper procedure. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 107 So. 3d 563 (Fla, 1st DCA 2013); Nix v. State…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Adkins, 96 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2012)
- Maestas v. State, 76 So. 3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)