FRANK MONTE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
FRANK MONTE, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
103 So. 3d 864
Florida Supreme Court (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Monte v. State, 51 So.3d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. See Monte v. State, 68 So.3d 235 (Fla.2011) (table). Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Terrick M. Crosby v. State, 125 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…on the time between an initial offer and a subsequent critical stage, but rather is dependent on whether there are any intervening critical stages.” Monte v. State, 51 So. 3d 1196, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), review dismissed as improvidently granted, 103 So. 3d 864 (Fla.2012). “[I]n situations where a defendant has properly waived the right to counsel, a trial court may proceed with the stage where counsel was waived without further offer of counsel.” Knight v. State, 770 So. 2d 663, 669 (Fla.2000). Here, Mr.…
Authorities Cited
- Monte v. State, 51 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
- Smallwood v. State, 68 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 2011)