JASON BUDNICK, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LEONARD BUDNICK, APPELLANT,
v.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLEE
JASON BUDNICK, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LEONARD BUDNICK, APPELLANT,
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLEE
101 So. 3d 938
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objec*939tion to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992).
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, J., and BONAVITA, AUGUST, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Steinhorst v. State, 412 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1982)
- Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1992)
- Corona v. State, 64 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 2011)
- Minouche Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)