ROBERT BLAINE LEFTWICH, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
ROBERT BLAINE LEFTWICH, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
101 So. 3d 404
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with our decision in McBride v. Moore, 780 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the circuit court correctly concluded that after being sentenced as an habitual offender, petitioner was ineligible for provisional credits on all his sentences, including those imposed before he was designated an habitual offender. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of certiora-ri on the merits, but CERTIFY that our *405decision conflicts with Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
WOLF, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leftwich v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 148 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 2014)
Authorities Cited
- Royce M. Reed v. State, 874 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- McBRIDE v. Moore, 780 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)