ERIC NOVESHEN, PETITIONER,
v.
LAW OFFICES OF BARRY FRANKLIN & ASSOCIATES, AND CHRISTINE NOVESHEN, N/K/A CHRISTINA CARTER, RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Compel Compliance cases and more on FLexlaw
We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the trial court’s order granting the respondent’s motion to compel compliance with outstanding discovery in aid of execution directed to him, which was entered ex parte despite petitioner having filed an objection to the discovery. The court entered the order pursuant to Local Rule 10A of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit which permits the entry of an ex parte order compelling discovery where there has been a complete failure to respond or object to discovery.
The ex parte order is quashed, as the petitioner had filed objections and a motion for protective order prior to the motion to compel being filed. As we held in Waters v. American General Corp., 770 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), the local rule can apply only where the conditions in the order are met, namely the failure to respond at all to discovery requests. That condition was not met in this case. The rules of civil procedure apply and require proper notice of the motion and hearing.
WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. Brown, 180 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…ity for the daughter’s annual physical examination over to Ms. Brown. Mr. Brown specifically requested it in his petition. And having received the relief his petition requested, he cannot rightfully challenge it now on appeal. See Anderson v. State, 93 So. 3d 1201, 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).…
-
Beckstrom v. Beckstrom, 183 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…rmer husband’s argument on the life insurance issue. “‘Under the invited error rale, a party cannot successfully complain about an error for which he or she is responsible or of rulings that he or she invited the court to make.’ ” Anderson v. State, 93 So. 3d 1201, 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (quoting Muina v. Canning, 111 So. 2d 550, 553-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)). Here, the former husband agreed to purchase a $100,000 life insurance policy and included such a provision in his proposed final judgment. He cannot no…
-
Flowers v. State, 149 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…no longer claim error. We agree. The invited error doctrine is succinct: “[A] party cannot.successfully complain about an error, for which he or she is responsible or of rulings that he or she [*1208] invited the court to make.” Anderson v. State, 93 So. 3d 1201, 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Put another way, “a party may not make or invite error at trial and then take advantage of the error on appeal.” Id. at 1206. As applied here, “counsel should not be allowed to sandbag the trial judge by requesting and app…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Barry K. Waters, M.D., P.A. v. Am. Gen. Corp., 770 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)