ORESTE DORRIELAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Intramed, Inc. v. Guider, 93 So. 3d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …per. See Carnival Corp. v. Pajares, 972 So. 2d 973, 977-78 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Revuelta, 901 So. 2d 377, 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Chin v. Caiaffa, 42 So. 3d 300, 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Health First, Inc. v. Cataldo, 92 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). The closing argument was designed to inflame the emotions of the jury rather than prompt a “logical analysis of the evidence in light of the applicable law.” Murphy v. Int’l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010, 1028 (Fla.2000).…
• KEY W. Seaside, LLC v. Certified Lower Keys Plumbing, Inc., 208 So. 3d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …reviews de novo a trial court’s ruling on a motion to award attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the offer of judgment statute and rule. Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So. 3d 1132, 1134 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Health First, Inc. v. Cataldo, 92 So. 3d 859, 869 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Jacksonville Golfair, Inc. v. Grover, 988 So. 2d 1225, 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).…
• Mathis v. Cook, 140 So. 3d 654 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …satisfy the particularity requirement.” Id. We have previously held that proposals for settlement made by one plaintiff on separate defendants, conditioned on the dismissal of both defendants, were not ambiguous. See Health First, Inc. v. Cataldo, 92 So. 3d 859, 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (where interests of the defendants were coextensive, offer of judgment not invalidated because of plaintiffs promise to release remaining defendants as a non-monetary term of the settlement); see also Andrews v. Frey, 66 So.…

Authorities Cited

• McArthur Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1992)
• Suttles v. Hightower, 516 U.S. 1031 (U.S. 1995)
• Singletary v. Smith, 516 U.S. 1031 (U.S. 1995)