JUSTIN E. MAYS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-05-02
No. 4D10-313
HAZOURI, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
88 So. 3d 332 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant Justin Mays’ petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel so that the trial court may correct a scrivener’s error contained in the petitioner’s judgment. See Sinyard v. State, 799 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(d). Mays’ judgment incorrectly lists one of his charges as “Count 3” (Criminal Solicitation) instead of “Count 5” (also Criminal Solicitation). Count 3 of the information charged Mays’ codefendant— Hakam Sueliman — not Mays. Mays, however, was charged with Criminal Solicitation under Count 5. We direct the trial court to enter a corrected judgment. The remaining claims raised are denied without comment.

Petition Granted in part; Denied in part; and Remanded.

HAZOURI, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw