ALPHONZO J. CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2012-04-27
No. 3D12-547
Before RAMIREZ, LAGOA, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
86 So. 3d 1193 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …he challenged order here failed to comply with the requisites of rule 8.250(b)(3), co-respondent Guardian ad Litem suggests that we deny B.D.’s petition in part and follow the example of our sister court in K.K. v. Department of Children & Families, 86 So. 3d 1193, 1193-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), by ordering a limited remand to allow the trial court to enter an order that complies with rule 8.250(b)(3)’s mandate that the order specify the time, place, manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the to…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw