JUSTINA MARIE SHAFFER, WIFE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ERIC MATTHEW SHAFFER, HUSBAND, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
JUSTINA MARIE SHAFFER, WIFE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
ERIC MATTHEW SHAFFER, HUSBAND, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
84 So. 3d 1075
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The Order Denying Former Wife’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is AFFIRMED. The cross-appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So.2d 1020, 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (noting that a. trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees and costs at a later time does not affect the finality of the judgment itself for purposes of appeal and dismissing the former husband’s appeal because while his notice of appeal was timely as to the attorney’s fee order, it was untimely as to the underlying order, which is what he challenged).
DAVIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Viker v. Cherry (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)