GENARO CASILLA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
GENARO CASILLA, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
82 So. 3d 186
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition is granted and Genaro Ca-silla is hereby afforded a belated appeal from judgment and sentence in Gadsden County Case Number 11-18-CF. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the circuit court who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).
The circuit court shall appoint counsel to represent Casilla in the direct appeal if he qualifies for such an appointment.
PETITION GRANTED.
VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
NIX v. State, 84 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…e, must also be reversed. See Pullam v. State, 55 So. 3d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the fine and surcharge after providing notice to Appellant and following the proper procedure.2 Accord Williams v. State, 82 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing judgment for fines, costs and surcharges “because the trial court failed to delineate the discretionary fine(s) when announcing at sentencing that it would impose $1,522.50 in costs and fines,” and stating that the ass…
-
Sharpe v. State, 115 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…cost was error. See Pullam v. State, 55 So. 3d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). On remand, the trial court may re-impose the fine, surcharge, and court cost after providing notice to Appellant and following the proper procedure. See Williams v. State, 82 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing judgment for fines, costs, and surcharges “because the trial court failed to delineate the discretionary fine(s) when announcing at sentencing that it would impose $1,522.50 in costs and fines,” and stating the assessm…
-
Talbot v. State, 159 So. 3d 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…DCA 2014). On remand, the trial court may either enter a corrected judgment striking the amounts, or it may reimpose those fines/costs after providing notice and following the proper procedure. See Nix, 84 So. 3d at 426; see also Williams v. State, 82 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing judgment for fines, costs and surcharges “because the trial court failed to delineate the discretionary fine(s) when announcing at sentencing that it would impose $1,522.50 in costs and fines,” and stating that the ass…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence