MARIE GLINSKI, APPELLANT,
v.
PAN AMERICAN BANK AND CNA, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-12-09
No. 1D11-1512
WETHERELL and SWANSON, J.J., concur.
79 So. 3d 781 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A workers' compensation claimant receiving permanent total disability benefits since 1990 failed to timely complete and return an earnings report form as required by statute. The employer/carrier suspended her benefits for non-compliance, and the court affirmed that the suspension was proper under Florida law, which allows carriers to suspend PTD benefits when employees willfully fail to report earnings as requested.


Holding

The court affirmed that competent, substantial evidence supported the finding of willful failure to complete the earnings report, and that the unambiguous statutory language authorized the employer/carrier to suspend disability benefits for willful noncompliance without obtaining prior permission from the Judge of Compensation Claims.


Headnotes

[1] An employer/carrier may suspend permanent total disability benefits when an employee willfully fails or refuses to report earnings and social security income as required…

[2] Willful failure to complete and submit an earnings report, even when submitted through counsel, can justify the suspension of disability benefits.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The employer or carrier, shall not be required to make any payment of benefits for the permanent total disability for any period during which the employee willfully fails or refuses to report, upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules.”

This statutory provision is the core legal authority permitting the carrier to suspend PTD benefits for willful failure to complete earnings reports.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Marie Glinski received permanent total disability benefits since 1990. On August 26, 2009, the employer/carrier sent her an Earnings Report Form (DWC-…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MARSTILLER, J.

MARSTILLER, J.

Workers’ compensation claimant Marie Glinski (“Claimant”) has been receiving permanent total disability (“PTD”) benefits since 1990. On August 26, 2009, the employer/carrier (“E/C”) provided her an Earnings Report Form (DWC-19) to complete and return within twenty-one days. See § 440.15(l)(e)2.b., Fla. Stat. (1983). The form covered the period November 1, 2007, through August 26, 2009. Claimant returned the form, via counsel, on September 22, 2009, but failed to complete the portions asking for social security and other income received during the reporting period. The E/C made a subsequent request for a completed form but did not receive one. As a result, on December 21, 2009, the E/C suspended Claimant’s disability benefits. When Claimant finally submitted a complete earnings report on January 15, 2010, the E/C resumed the disability payments.

Claimant later filed a petition for benefits (“PFB”) claiming entitlement to the disability benefits the E/C did not pay her during the suspension period, December 21, 2009, to January 15, 2010. After an evidentiary hearing, the Judge of Compensation Claims (“JCC”) denied the petition finding that Claimant willfully failed to complete the earnings report and that the E/C properly suspended disability payments as a consequence. Claimant argues on appeal that no competent, substantial evidence in the record shows willful failure on her part to timely complete and submit an Earnings Report Form. She also argues that the E/C had no authority to suspend her PTD benefits on its own when her entitlement to such benefits was adjudicated rather than administratively determined. We disagree with both arguments and affirm.

Section 440.15(l)(e)2.b., Florida Statutes (1983), provides:

The division shall provide by rule for the periodic reporting to the employer or carrier of all earnings of any nature and social security income by the injured employee entitled to or claiming benefits *783for permanent total disability. The employer or carrier, shall not be required to make any payment of benefits for the permanent total disability for any period during which the employee willfully fails or refuses to report, upon request by the employer or carrier in the manner prescribed by such rules.

Florida Administrative Code Rule 69L-3.021(2) requires an employee to return a completed Earnings Report Form within twenty-one days after receipt from the E/C. The evidence in the record shows that Claimant received the form on August 26, 2009, but failed to supply the requested earnings information until January 15, 2010. Although she submitted the form in September 2009 through her attorney, that form did not contain the necessary financial information. At the hearing on her PFB, Claimant testified she did not know why she failed to complete the form in a timely manner, but cited as a possible reason that she was off her thyroid medication for a period. The JCC did not err in finding this testimony insufficient to overcome evidence of willful noncompliance. We further conclude that the unambiguous language of the above-quoted statutory provision authorized the E/C to stop paying Claimant disability benefits until she submitted a complete earnings report. The statutory language does not require an E/C to seek permission from a JCC before suspending disability benefits previously awarded by judicial determination. See Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla.1984) (holding that clear and unambiguous statutory language must be given its plain and obvious meaning). AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL and SWANSON, J.J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw