KARLEEN DORIS BONOW, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pitts v. State, 227 So. 3d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
  …it was just a dog— that he didn’t know someone had been killed or seriously injured—the State presented evidence of the nature of the vehicle damage, which is enough to establish that he should have known there was serious injury. See K.W. v. State, 78 So. 3d 74, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (citing Williams v. State, 732 So. 2d 431, 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)). There was also evidence that the victim was standing when struck, rolled over the hood, and impacted the windshield. This evidence further supports a finding…
• Booker v. State, 103 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …scene. See State v. Mancuso, 652 So. 2d 370, 371-72 (Fla.1995). Instead, the State must also “establish that the driver ‘either knew of the resulting injury or death or reasonably should have known from the nature of the accident.’ ” K.W. v. State, 78 So. 3d 74, 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (quoting Mancuso, 652 So. 2d at 372). Further, when there are multiple impacts, the driver must know of the specific impact that actually resulted in the injury. Id. at 76. This knowledge, like other states of mind, must be de…
• McGOWAN v. State, 139 So. 3d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …scene. See State v. Mancuso, 652 So. 2d 370, 371-72 (Fla.1995). Instead, the State must also “establish that the driver ‘either knew of the resulting injury or death or reasonably should have known from the nature of the accident.’ ” K.W. v. State, 78 So. 3d 74, 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (quoting Mancuso, 652 So. 2d at 372). Further, when there are multiple impacts, the driver must know of the specific impact that actually resulted in the injury. Id. at 76. Appellant contends that the evidence never proved th…

Authorities Cited

• Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
• Holmes v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)