ZEBEDEE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-01-06
No. 1D11-0048
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.
76 So. 3d 410 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

A defendant has a constitutional right to be present at a restitution hearing unless the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waives that right. See Knespler v. State, 72 So.3d 299, 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). In the instant case, because he was not present at the restitution hearing and because there is nothing in the record to suggest he waived his right to be present, the appellant is entitled to a new restitution hearing. See id. Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with directions to the trial court to hold a new restitution hearing.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kleintank v. State, 178 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …to enter a restitution order. See Farley v. State, 55 So. 3d 721, 721-22 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we strike the restitution order. On remand,' the trial court may conduct a restitution hearing with Kleintank present. See Williams v. State, 76 So. 3d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding defendant has constitutional right to be present at restitution hearing unless defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives that right). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. PALMER, J., and…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw