EDDIE LEE REESE, APPELLANT,
v.
AMY LESLIE MARCUS, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Record Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
Eddie Lee Reese appeals from an order denying his motion to dissolve a Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence. He claims that the trial court erred by failing to afford him basic due process in connection with the hearing on his motion to dissolve the injunction. Because the limited record supplied by Appellant in the appendix to his brief does not support this argument, we affirm. See, e.g., Starks v. Starks, 423 So.2d 452, 453-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (finding that without a transcript of the hearing, the appellate court is unable to ascertain whether the lower court erred; noting that “[t]he appellant retains the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness .... [which] includes a demonstration of error from the record, which he must supply”) (quoting Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (emphasis in original)).
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, LAWSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ferguson Enters., Inc. v. Astro AIR Conditioning AND Heating, 137 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…[w]ithout receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange.” The complaint tracked the language of sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2012). This was sufficient to state a claim of fraudulent transfer. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Nieves, 75 So. 3d 339, 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). The circuit court improperly looked beyond the four corners of the complaint when it dismissed counts V and VI under New Holland, 579 So. 2d 215. “[A] motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action is not a substi…
-
Arbor Grove Dev., LLC v. ECS1, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Starks v. Starks, 423 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)