WILBERT CROSTON, APPELLANT,
v.
YALE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-11-09
No. 3D11-578
Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
75 So. 3d 338 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we cannot find that the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s objection to sale and motion to vacate default final judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See First Response Grp., Inc. v. Castro, 971 So.2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Moise v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McKnight v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 214 So. 3d 775 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (burden to establish irregularity of sale is on party objecting to foreclosure sale); Croston v. Yale Mortg. Corp., 75 So. 3d 338, 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“On the record before us, we cannot find that the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s objection to sale . . . constitutes a gross abuse of discretion.”).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw