MIKHAIL BELOV, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-10-25
No. 1D11-3524
BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
72 So. 3d 320 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The agreed motion requesting remand for a hearing de novo is granted. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and the cause remanded for a new hearing. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 87 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …s some indication to a police officer that he might be in need of assistance on the roadway, a reasonable person in such circumstances would not necessarily perceive the officer’s use of emergency lights as a show of authority. See State v. Seymour, 72 So. 3d 320, 322-23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (officer’s activation of emergency lights did not constitute a seizure where the officer stopped in response to three men on the side of the road flagging him down). However, in this case there was no objective indication…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw