R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
AMANDA JEAN HALL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR HALL SR., DECEASED, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
AMANDA JEAN HALL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR HALL SR., DECEASED, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
70 So. 3d 642
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Martin, 53 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Earline Alexander, 90 So. 3d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…gence. See McQuillin, 840 So. 2d at 347. . R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Gray, 63 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA) (citing Martin in affirming a $7 million non-economic damage award), rev. den., 67 So. 3d 1050 (Fla.2011); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Hall, 70 So. 3d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA) (citing Martin in affirming a $5 million non-economic damage award), rev. den., 67 So. 3d 1050 (Fla.2011); Liggett Group LLC v. Campbell, 60 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA) (citing Martin in affirming a $7.8 mil [*312] lion non-economic da…1 / 2
-
T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 79 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…d, Appellant confined her privacy allegation to a claim under Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution. However, because Article I, Section 23 is limited in its scope by Article I, Section 27 of the Florida Constitution, cf. State v. Geiss, 70 So. 3d 642, 646-47 (Fla. 5th DC A), rev. granted, 70 So. 3d 587 (Fla.2011), I doubt that the same arguments are even available to Appellant under the Florida Constitution's express privacy guarantee as may be available under the privacy protections implied in…
-
State v. Liles, 191 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…searches and seizures. Amend. IV, U.S. Const. A blood draw conducted at the direction of the police is a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 767, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966); State v. Geiss, 70 So. 3d 642, 646 (Fla. 5th. DCA.2011). To comply with the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers must obtain a warrant or consent for a blood draw, or there must be some other exception to the warrant requirement. See Kilburn v. State, 54 So. 3d 625, 627 (F…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Matilde C. Martin, 53 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)