SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, APPELLEE
SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, APPELLEE
69 So. 3d 311
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We find no error and affirm. We specifically reject appellant’s contention that the trial court was bound to declare whether the School Board was excluded from the terms of the Apopka city ordinance and that the trial court acted in excess of its jurisdiction in concluding that the terms of the ordinance did not control the billing of the franchise fees to its customers.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. S. v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)…(4) when notice against by posting, fencing, or cultivation as described in s. 810.011 . . . commits the offense of trespass on property other than a structure or conveyance. entering or remaining had been given to the defendant." K.M.B. v. State, 69 So. 3d 311, 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting Seago v. State, 768 So. 2d 498, 500 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)). Notice may be provided to the defendant either by "actual communication . . . or by posting, fencing, or cultivation . . . ." § 810.09(1)(a)1. Notice by fe…