NAZIH HALAWY, APPELLANT,
v.
THELMA HALAWY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in requiring one parent to pay the entire child support amount when equal income was imputed to both parents.
During a dissolution of marriage action, the trial court issued a nonfinal child support order imputing minimum wage income to both parents. The fathe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Nazih and Thelma Halawy, the parties in this long-term marriage, had a child who was still a minor when their dissolution of marriage action commenced. In a nonfinal child support order, the trial court imputed minimum wage income to each parent. Mr. Halawy appeals this nonfinal child support order,1 contending that the trial court erred in requiring him to pay the entire amount despite the fact that the trial court imputed equal income to each of them.2
Mrs. Halawy concedes the error and we agree.3 We reverse and remand for correction of this error in the order on child support.4
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
*448SILBERMAN, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L„ ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.