ANTON C. DOE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentences but remanded for the trial court to strike one duplicative cost.
The defendant was convicted of attempted robbery with a firearm and sentenced. The trial court imposed the Indigent Criminal Defense Fee twice, once i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
In this Anders1 appeal with preserved sentencing issues,2 Doe seeks review of his convictions and sentences for five counts of attempted robbery with a firearm. We affirm Doe’s convictions and sentences without further comment. However, we remand for the trial court to strike one duplicative cost.
The record shows that the trial court twice imposed the Indigent Criminal Defense Fee pursuant to section 27.52, Florida Statutes (2009) — once in the amount of $50 in the final judgment and sentence that was rendered January 21, 2009, and amended on June 15, 2010, and again in the amount of $40 in a separate “judgment for fine and costs” that was rendered on January 26, 2009. This fee is assessed per application for counsel, see § 27.52(l)(b) *351(imposing the fee “for each application for court-appointed counsel”), and nothing in the record shows that Doe submitted more than one application for court-appointed counsel. Accordingly, we remand with directions to the court to strike as duplica-tive the separate “judgment for fine and costs” pursuant to section 27.52 in the amount of $40 rendered January 26, 2009.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.