KATHLEEN SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES W.P. SMITH, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2011-05-06
Nos. 5D10-1711, 5D10-2389
PALMER, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
62 So. 3d 672 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Kathleen Smith appeals from an order approving the sale of certain real property pursuant to a sales contract procured by the court-appointed special magistrate. The special magistrate had been appointed by the court pursuant to a final judgment of partition. See § 64.061(4), Fla. Stat. (2008).

Our review is limited because of the lack of a transcript. In the absence of a transcript of the evidentiary hearing below, we are obligated to affirm the trial court unless fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order. Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So.2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). No such error appears on the face of the trial court’s order.1

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. James W.P. Smith, 83 So. 3d 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Smith v. Smith, 62 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw