LUDOLFO MEDINA, PETITIONER,
v.
FONTAINEBLEAU HILTON AND FHM INS. CO./UNITED SELF INSURED, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the award of attorney's fees on cross-appeal but reversed the award on the direct appeal, concerning a dispute over attorney's fees related to an automobile insurance policy claim.
The court affirmed the issue raised on cross-appeal regarding attorney's fees but reversed the issue raised on direct appeal, implying the full attorney's fees sought were not awarded.
After an automobile accident, the insured's policy was reinstated retroactively, and the insurer eventually paid for property damage after a significa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DENIED. See, e.g., Dep’t of Revenue v. Groman, 46 So.3d 1058, 1060-61 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Taylor v. TGI Friday’s, Inc., 16 So.3d 312, 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Dawson v. Clerk of Cir. Ct.-Hillsborough County, 991 So.2d 407, 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).
BENTON, C.J., WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Powell v. State, 120 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…ke private actors, have a limited license to approach a dwelling on a defined path, knock on the front door, briefly await an answer, and either engage in a consensual encounter with the resident or immediately depart. See, e.g., Nieminski v. State, 60 So. 3d 521, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Waldo v. State, 975 So. 2d 542, 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). A resident has the option to either open the door or refuse to do so. Kentucky v. King, - U.S. -, -, 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1862, 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011) (whether knock is by…
-
State v. Ojeda, 147 So. 3d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…endment, even absent reasonable suspicion.”); United States v. Cormier, 220 F. 3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir.2000) (“[N]o suspicion needed to be shown in order to justify the ‘knock and talk.’ ”). The Second District Court of Appeal in Nieminski v. State, 60 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), examined whether law enforcement may open a closed but unlocked gate and walk to the front door of a house to engage in a “knock and talk.” The court concluded that “a citizen’s encounter, including a knock and talk, is not regar…
-
J.W. v. State, 95 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…the issue of "standing” (i.e., the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy) in conjunction with the ultimate determination of whether the search or seizure was conducted in compliance with the Fourth Amendment. See e.g., Nieminski v. State, 60 So. 3d 521, 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (citing Hicks v. State, 929 So. 2d 13, 16 n. 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)). . There is no evidence, for example, that J.W. (as opposed to Mr. Locke) was the actual owner of the pouch and its contents. Nor is there any evidence that…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fowler v. Escambia Cnty. Sch. Bd., 991 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
- Anderson v. State, 16 So. 3d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- Taylor v. TGI Friday's, 16 So. 3d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- CRC 1809, LLC v. N. Carillon, LLC, 46 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
- Dep't OF Revenue & The Div. of Risk Management-State of Fla. v. Groman, 46 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)