ACIE WARREN BENSON, APPELLANT,
v.
EUGENIE M. FISHER, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-03-23
No. 3D10-402
Before GERSTEN, CORTINAS, and LAGOA, JJ.
59 So. 3d 225 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89, 91 (Fla.1995).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Innocent Gedehomme v. State, 160 So. 3d 533 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
    …ot counseled for purposes of the motion based on appellate counsel’s filing an Anders brief and because the motion was timely filed. See Lopez v. State, 905 So. 2d 1045, 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) abrogated on other grounds as stated in Pifer v. State, 59 So. 3d 225, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Thus the court should have considered the motion on the merits. The filing of the rule 3.800(b)(2) motion preserved the errors raised therein for our review. See Jackson, 983 So. 2d at 571. Gedehomme challenges that he was…
  • Ventura v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw