JAMES KYLE DORAN, HUSBAND, APPELLANT,
v.
DANA MARIE DORAN, WIFE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-03-28
No. 1D10-6841
THOMAS, WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.
57 So. 3d 933 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 13, 2011, the Court has determined that the Amended Final Judgment is not a final order as it reserves jurisdiction to expend additional judicial labor over the non-collateral issue of child support. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion to Extend Time for Filing, filed on March 9, 2011, is denied as moot.

THOMAS, WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Semico Glin v. Kurtis Keith Glin, 207 So. 3d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …PER CURIAM. DISMISSED, See Doran v. Doran, 57 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (dismissing appeal where order reserved jurisdiction over non-collateral issue of child support). Cf. Dirienzo-Gluhareff v. Gluhareff, 865 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (affirming denial of post-dissolution motion to enforce tempo…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw