SANDY T. FOX, APPELLANT,
v.
IN RE MATTER OF KEVIN MINCEY & KATINA ROYAL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-02-16
No. 3D10-528
Before GERSTEN, CORTIÑAS, and LAGOA, JJ.
53 So. 3d 1236 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm under an abuse of discretion standard of review. However, we, like the trial court, would be remiss if we did not commend Sandy T. Fox for his outstanding work as a guardian ad litem in this case.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • S.F. v. State, 56 So. 3d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …8.19, Florida Statutes (2009), which also fails because Miami-Dade. County has not, as section 938.19 requires, specifically elected to apply the cost to delinquencies. See Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code of Ordinances, § 98- [*117] 185; EM. v. State, 53 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); E.J. v. State, 912 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2005). Affirmed in part; stricken in part.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw