EIGHT PEAKS CAPITAL, LLC, PETITIONER,
v.
HUMBERTO E. SANTOS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-01-19
No. 3D10-2899
Before GERSTEN, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
51 So. 3d 640 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant Eight Peaks Capital, LLC’s petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on its July 20, 2010, and September 23, 2010, motions for deficiency judgment.

Because we are confident the trial court will comply forthwith, we withhold issuance of the formal writ for thirty (30) days.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rush v. Burdge, 141 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …ke discovery. See Liebreich v. Church of Scientology Flag Serv. Org., Inc., 855 So. 2d 658, 659 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“Rule 1.380(a)(4) provides for the award of expenses on a motion for order compelling discovery....”); Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Chase, 51 So. 3d 640, 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (reversing sanctions as inappropriate under rule 1.380 “because the Appellees did not prevail on a motion to compel and Appellant’s counsel did not fail to appear at a duly noticed deposition”). While we conclude that this…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw