SHEMIKA LASHONDA BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2010-12-15
No. 4D09-4045
GROSS, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.
49 So. 3d 340 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in denying the motion to correct a sentencing error because the scoresheet contained erroneous points.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant admitted to violating probation, but her scoresheet erroneously included points for a prior, dismissed violation. The trial court denied her…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Shemika Bell timely appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to correct a *341sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). We reverse and remand for correction of the scoresheet and resentencing.

Bell was on probation. An affidavit of violation of probation was filed, but was ultimately dismissed. A few months later, a second affidavit of violation was filed for conduct different than that covered in the first affidavit. Appellant admitted the violations contained in the second affidavit. Her scoresheet erroneously contained six extra points for a community sanction violation, apparently based on the first affidavit of violation that had been dismissed.

The record does not conclusively establish that the trial court would have sentenced Bell to the same sentence in this case had the scoresheet been correct. See Sanders v. State, 35 So.3d 864, 870-71 (Fla.2010). From the comments made in the sentencing transcript, it appears that both the trial judge and the prosecutor operated under the assumption that Bell’s probation had previously been violated.

Reversed.

GROSS, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw