TAMRA E. PIERCE, APPELLANT,
v.
LINDA M. PIERCE, APPELLEE
TAMRA E. PIERCE, APPELLANT,
LINDA M. PIERCE, APPELLEE
46 So. 3d 606
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 8, 2010, the Court has determined that the order on appeal, which denied a motion to enforce a mediated settlement agreement and set aside the agreement upon determining it was signed under duress, is not one which finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a *607probate matter. Thus, the order is not subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions are denied as moot.
DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tamra E. Pierce v. Linda Marie Pierce in re Estate of Cecilie Redlinger Pierce, 128 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…greement. For the reasons stated, the order setting aside the mediated settlement agreement is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WETHERELL and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. * In Pierce v. Pierce, 46 So. 3d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), rev. denied, 64 So. 3d 1261 (Fla.2011) (table), we dismissed a direct appeal of this order for lack of jurisdiction since it was a non-appealable, non-final order. Review is now proper pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Proce…