STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLANT,
v.
JASON BERG, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Department of Motor Vehicles appealed an order dismissing an action for lack of prosecution against Jason Berg and sanctioning DMV's counsel with a $250 donation to the law library. The court affirmed the dismissal but reversed the sanction, holding that the trial court failed to follow the procedural safeguards required for imposing criminal contempt sanctions.
The dismissal for lack of prosecution is affirmed, but the sanction imposed on counsel is reversed because the trial court failed to comply with the procedural requirements for imposing criminal contempt sanctions, including issuing a show cause order, holding a hearing, allowing presentation of mitigating circumstances, and pronouncing sentence in open court.
[1] A trial court may dismiss an action for lack of prosecution when no parties or counsel attend a scheduled status conference.
[2] A compelled donation to a county law library, not benefiting the adverse party, constitutes a criminal contempt sanction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Such sanction is plainly a criminal contempt sanction — a compelled "donation" to the county law library in no way benefits the adverse party and "'[a]ny flat, unconditional fine is considered a criminal [contempt] sanction.'"”
Establishes that the $250 donation constitutes a criminal contempt sanction subject to strict procedural requirements.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAfter none of the parties or counsel appeared at a scheduled status conference for lack of prosecution, the trial court entered an order dismissing th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lack Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
The Florida Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) challenges an order dismissing an action for lack of prosecution between DMV and petitioner Jason Berg and requiring DMV’s counsel to make a $250 donation to the Palm Beach County law library as a sanction for her failure to appear at a “status conference for lack of prosecution.” We affirm the dismissal, but reverse the order to the extent that it imposes a sanction upon counsel.
Here, after none of the parties or counsel attended a scheduled status conference, the trial court immediately entered an order dismissing the case for lack of prosecution and imposed a sanction on DMV’s counsel. Such sanction is plainly a criminal contempt sanction — a compelled “donation” to the county law library in no way benefits the adverse party and “ ‘[a]ny flat, unconditional fine is considered a criminal [contempt] sanction.’ ” In re Steffens, 988 So.2d 142, 144 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (quoting Parisi v. Broward Cnty., 769 So.2d 359, 365 (Fla.2000)). Counsel’s failure to appear for a scheduled hearing has been characterized as an “indirect criminal contempt,” triggering the application of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Id.
Rule 3.840 requires the court to issue an order to the would-be contemnor stating the charge and requiring the party to appear before the court and show cause as to why he or she should not be held in contempt. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.840(a). *575The rule requires a hearing, that the defendant is afforded an opportunity to present evidence of mitigating circumstances, and that sentence be pronounced in open court. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.840(d), (g). None of those safeguards were employed in the instant case and, when contempt sanctions are at issue, “strict compliance” with the rules is required. See Fiore v. Athineos, 9 So.3d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Accordingly, we reverse the order to the extent that it imposes a sanction upon counsel. Our reversal is without prejudice for further proceedings in regard to a sanction if the trial court so chooses.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
GROSS, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Parisi v. Broward Cnty., 769 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 2000)
- In re Steffens, 988 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
- Malissa Fiore v. Athineos, 9 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)