RAYMOND GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-09-13
No. 1D09-1551
WEBSTER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
43 So. 3d 924 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of his convictions and sentences for trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. He raises only one issue — that the trial court committed reversible error when it permitted the state to display to the jury during closing arguments transcripts of recorded telephone conversations notwithstanding its earlier ruling that the transcripts would not be received as evidence because their accuracy had neither been stipulated to nor independently determined by the court *925before trial. We agree with appellant that this was error. See Martinez v. State, 761 So.2d 1074 (Fla.2000). However, we also agree with the state that, given the other evidence of appellant’s guilt, the error was harmless to the exclusion of all reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw