OCTAVIOUS J. CRUMBY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-08-13
No. 1D10-2192
HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
41 So. 3d 1092 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Excel Auto Group, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Ill So.2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that the rule providing for an additional five days for a party to do some act required to be done after service of a document by mail does not apply to the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari).

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. State, 53 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
    …aim because as alleged it is facially insufficient, our affirmance is without prejudice to Jones’ filing a facially sufficient motion seeking any credit due him for the time he spent in juvenile detention prior to his convictions. See Orta v. State, 41 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). Affirmed. MORRIS and KHOUZAM, JJ„ Concur.…
  • Meekins v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 114 So. 3d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    …[*415] PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Crumby v. State, 41 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). WOLF, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw