GLESTON N. EDWARDS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GLESTON N. EDWARDS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
35 So. 3d 121
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. We affirm. A Rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the conviction. See Prince v. State, 903 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gurth v. State, 50 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…IAM. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the factual basis used to support her plea in this appeal of the denial of her Rule 3.800(a) motion. “A rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the factual basis for a plea.” Marshall v. State, 35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citing Sanchez v. State, 979 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)). Appellant’s challenge was to her conviction, not to her sentence, and was not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Cook v. State, 885 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 20…
-
Kevis McCRAY v. State, 49 So. 3d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Edwards v. State, 35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.…
-
Atticus E. Jones v. State, 78 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…es appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, which challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Rule 3.800(a) cannot be used to challenge the conviction or the sufficiency of the evidence. See Edwards v. State, 35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Childers v. State, 782 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Marshall v. State, 35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Affirmed. WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Prince v. State, 903 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)