JORGE L. MARTI, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O GLORIA C. LANDA, APPELLEE
JORGE L. MARTI, JR., APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O GLORIA C. LANDA, APPELLEE
34 So. 3d 244
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based on the Department of Revenue’s confession of error, we reverse and remand this matter to the lower tribunal for a new administrative hearing before the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fortune v. Fortune, 61 So. 3d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…um of permanent - periodic alimony, which will give the court jurisdiction to reconsider [*447] the award should the parties’ financial circumstances change.” Schmidt v. Schmidt, 997 So. 2d 451, 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); see also Purrinos v. Purrinos, 34 So. 3d 244, 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). In light of the trial court’s failure to award permanent alimony to the wife and the husband’s decision to stay in the financial planning business based on his belief that his earning capacity will improve in the future, the…
-
Hedman v. Hedman, 97 So. 3d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…ge at any time at his whim) by depriving the husband of his established interest in valuable property. II. I do agree with the ruling, also challenged by the husband, which awarded alimony to the wife in a nominal amount. See Purrinos v. Purrinos, 34 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Gulbrandsen v. Gulbrandsen, 22 So. 3d 640, 645 n. 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Lightcap v. Lightcap, 14 So. 3d 259, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). . The final judgment states: "This is a court of equity and must do what is right. The Husband…