DAVID R. REIDY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-03-26
No. 5D10-619
MONACO, C.J, GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
30 So. 3d 705 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

David Reidy appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court dismissed his motion because Reidy had a pending petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in this court.1 The pendency of an original petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in this court does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to consider a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850. White v. State, 855 So.2d 723, 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Accordingly, the order of dismissal is reversed and Reidy’s motion is reinstated for consideration by the trial court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MONACO, C.J, GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw