NIVARDO LEON NUNEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NIVARDO LEON NUNEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
28 So. 3d 952
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence. The prosecutor’s isolated statement concerning the law, which was arguably a misstatement, followed by the trial court’s proper instructions to the jury with respect to the law does not constitute grounds for reversal. See Lugo v. State, 845 So.2d 74, 108-109 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 920, 124 S.Ct. 320, 157 L.Ed.2d 216 (2003); Cabrera v. State, 490 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Fennie v. State, 855 So.2d 597, 609 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 975, 124 S.Ct. 1877, 158 L.Ed.2d 471 (2004).
AFFIRMED.
MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lugo v. State, 845 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2003)
- Fennie v. State, 855 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 2003)
- Kennedy v. Venrock Assocs., 541 U.S. 975 (U.S. 2004)
- Boothe v. United States, 541 U.S. 975 (U.S. 2004)
- Jokinen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 540 U.S. 920 (U.S. 2003)
- Reddick v. Jones, 540 U.S. 920 (U.S. 2003)
- Cabrera v. State, 490 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)