M.S., APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Snavely Siesta Assocs., LLC v. Senker, 34 So. 3d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …Concur. . As opposed to relying on HUD's regulations, we note that some cases have relied on HUD's interpretive guidelines when construing section 1702. See, e.g., Samara Dev. Corp. v. Marlow, 556 So. 2d 1097 (Fla.1990); Aikin v. WCI Cmtys., Inc., 26 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Those cases state that the interpretive guidelines should be afforded great deference when trying to ascertain the meaning of a federal statute. In stating that proposition, however, both cases cite decisions dealing with federal…
• E.M. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 28 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …CURIAM. Just as we have affirmed recently the termination of parental rights of the mother, M.S., to the child, X.M., we, now likewise, affirm the termination of parental rights as to the father, E.M. See M.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 26 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); L.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 963 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Affirmed.…
• Pohlman v. Aqua Condo. Developers, Ltd, 44 So. 3d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …e trial court determined the contract was exempt from the ILSA because the seller was obligated to complete its obligations under the contract within two years. We agree and align our court with the well-reasoned opinion in Aikin v. WCI Communities, 26 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), and declare express conflict with the decision in Plaza Court, L.P. v. Baker-Chaput, 17 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). The ILSA is codified in 15 U.S.C. §§ 1702-1720 and was passed in the 1960’s to protect buyers of out-of-stat…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Catalino Melendez v. State, 963 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)