ANTHONY PROSSER, PETITIONER,

v.

PROUDFOOT CONSULTING COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND PROUDFOOT CONSULTING (EUROPE) LTD., A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF ENGLAND AND WALES, RESPONDENT

PER CURIAM.

The only issue properly before this court is whether petitioner is entitled to certiora-ri relief from that part of the circuit court’s order of July 10, 2009 compelling discovery. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the order is a departure from the essential requirements of law or that *588complying with it will result in irreparable injury. We note that our review of this case was immensely complicated by the form of the trial court’s order, which is a one-page order that adopts a 194-page transcript of the hearing on the underlying motions. We understand the pressures on a trial judge in a busy civil division. Here, the judge made clear and precise rulings. Professionalism dictates that the lawyers for the parties should be able to cull out the rulings of a court from a hearing and present them to the court in a one or two page proposed order. Orders taking the form of the one in this case are difficult to review and enforce. An order in a lawsuit should be worth at least as much as the paper it is printed on.

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.