JOHN O. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COMMISSION ON ETHICS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-12-15
No. 1D09-2562
WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
23 So. 3d 235 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rosenzweig v. Dep’t. of Transp., 979 So.2d 1050, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding that a claim of error, even in the administrative context, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Arza v. Fla. Elections Convm’n, 907 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that appellant could not challenge agency decision on appeal, where no challenge had been made below).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • West v. State, 82 So. 3d 987 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …i challenge has been repeatedly rejected by courts of this state, and the recidivist issue was rejected by the Supreme Court in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 528 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Recently, in Thompson v. State, 23 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), we confirmed “this question has been settled.” Id. at 235 (citing Jones v. State, 791 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and Wright v. State, 780 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)). We went on to hold: While appellant suggests that A…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw