WIGINS EXANTUS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WIGINS EXANTUS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
18 So. 3d 1221
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Sinclair v. State, 995 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
WARNER, FARMER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fields v. State, 107 So. 3d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…e is sufficient evidence in the record to justify [*1228] the admission of the evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. Even so, claims appellant, this evidence was testimonial in nature as explained in Washington v. State, 18 So. 3d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), and a violation of his right of confrontation as provided by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). This issue was not preserved below and will not be considered in this appeal. AFFIRMED.…
Authorities Cited
- Sinclair v. State, 995 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)