CLIFF HANSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Cliff Hanson petitioned for a belated appeal of his judgment and sentence. The court affirmed the Special Master's recommendation to deny the petition, but clarified important appellate rights by holding that defendants have constitutional and procedural rights to appeal even after entering a guilty plea, and that trial counsel cannot impose requirements for written appeals where timely oral requests are made.
Trial counsel cannot impose a requirement that a defendant submit written notice to appeal when a timely oral request is made, and such a delay establishes grounds for belated appeal. Additionally, a defendant who enters a guilty or nolo contendere plea retains the right to appeal, including reserved issues, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, plea agreement violations, involuntary pleas, and sentencing errors.
[1] A client is not required to submit a written request to counsel to secure the right to appeal.
[2] Delays in filing a notice of appeal caused by requiring a defendant to submit a written request after a timely oral request are grounds for a belated appeal.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“There is no requirement that a client must submit a written request to his or her attorney in order to secure the right to appeal. The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional.”
Establishes that trial counsel cannot impose written request policies and that appeal deadlines are jurisdictional
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHanson requested a belated appeal of his conviction and sentence. A Special Master conducted an evidentiary hearing and recommended the petition be de…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Belated Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
This petition seeks belated appeal of a judgment and sentence. This court relinquished jurisdiction to the circuit court to conduct an evidentiary hearing. After hearing testimony from petitioner and trial counsel, the Special Master has issued a report and recommendation that belated appeal be denied. We affirm the Special Master’s report and deny the petition on the merits. We write to address two issues concerning an affidavit submitted by trial counsel.
Trial counsel’s affidavit stated that it was her policy to require a defendant to provide counsel with written notice of his or her desire to appeal. There is no requirement that a client must submit a written request to his or her attorney in order to secure the right to appeal. The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(8). Any delays in filing a notice of appeal caused by requiring a defendant to submit a written request for appeal after a timely oral request is made will establish grounds for obtaining a belated appeal. State v. Trowell, 739 So.2d 77 (Fla.1999) (stating that an appellate court should grant a petition seeking belated appeal if the defendant establishes that a timely request of counsel to file the notice of appeal was made and counsel failed to do so).
Trial counsel’s affidavit also stated that even if petitioner had made a timely request for an appeal, counsel would not have filed a notice of appeal because the defendant entered a plea. Although there *616are limits to the issues that may be raised, a defendant who enters a guilty or nolo contendré plea does have the right to appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A). A defendant who enters a plea may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the trial court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Even if no express reservation to appeal a dispositive issue is made, a defendant who enters a plea retains the right to appeal the trial court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction, a violation of the plea agreement if preserved, an involuntary plea if preserved by a motion to withdraw plea, a sentencing error if preserved, or as otherwise provided by law. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
PETITION DENIED.
HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.