MARK EDWARD ROZIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK EDWARD ROZIER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
16 So. 3d 839
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238 (Fla.2007).
GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…that an issue could not be raised in a postconviction motion because, if it truly were a matter of fundamental error, it could have and should have been raised on direct appeal. See Franqui v. State, 965 So. 2d 22, 35 (Fla.2007); Brudnock v. State, 16 So. 3d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Obviously, there are times when an error that is unsuccessfully argued as fundamental error on direct appeal results in a facially sufficient claim in a postconviction proceeding because the trial lawyer was allegedly ineffecti…
Authorities Cited
- Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007)