ALCON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND CLAIMS CENTER/SUMMIT, PETITIONERS,
v.
JAMES M. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT
ALCON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND CLAIMS CENTER/SUMMIT, PETITIONERS,
JAMES M. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT
12 So. 3d 921
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DENIED. See, e.g., Vazquez v. Wendy’s, 931 So.2d 152, 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Prior to considering whether the order departs from the essential requirements of law, ... the petitioner must establish that the order results in irreparable harm.”); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter, 680 So.2d 546, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding “the time, trouble, and expense of an unnecessary trial is not ‘irreparable harm’ when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met”).
KAHN, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ellis, 152 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…petition yet evading review. See Kelley v. Rice, 800 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We conclude, however, that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the challenged ruling results in irreparable harm. See e.g., Alcon Const. Co., Inc. v. Williams, 12 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Mariner Health v. Griffith, 898 So. 2d 982, 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (as successor by merger to The Am. Tobacco Company) v. Grady Carter and Mildred Carter, 680 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Yodelmis Vazquez v. Wendy's and Ace-Usa, 931 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)