CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ALBIE SCOGGINS AND JAMES CHRULSKI, PETITIONERS,
v.
WONDERFUL T. MONDS AND LOIS SMITH-MONDS, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted certiorari and quashed the lower court's denial of a motion to dismiss, holding that absolute immunity bars individual claims against municipal employees for tortious interference with employment and negligent violation of Florida Statute section 448.045.
Absolute immunity bars individual claims against municipal employees for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship and negligent violation of Florida Statute section 448.045 when the acts occurred within the context of their employment.
[1] Absolute immunity protects municipal employees from individual liability for tortious interference with employment and negligent violation of statutory duties when the ch…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWonderful Monds, a City recreation department employee, and his wife Lois Monds, hired as an independent contractor to instruct hygiene classes, sued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Absolute Immunity cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioners Albie Scoggins and James Chrulski seek certiorari review of the lower court’s denial of a motion to dismiss. Respondent Wonderful Monds, an employee of the City’s recreation department, and his wife Lois Monds, hired by the City as an independent contractor to instruct hygiene classes, sued the City, and Scoggins and Chrulski, individually. Scoggins was Monds’ supervisor and Chrulski was the assistant recreation director. At issue are counts IV-VI, causes of action for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship — the Mondses’ employment — and an action for negligent violation of Florida Statute section 448.045 (Wrongful combinations against workers). Petitioners argue that the doctrine of absolute immunity bars the individual claims against them. We agree.
We grant the petition and quash the lower court’s order that denied the motion to dismiss counts IV-VI. Crowder v. Barbati, 987 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). In reaching our conclusion we look to Cassell v. India, 964 So.2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), as well as the allegations contained within the first amended complaint. The allegations reveal that the acts and statements at issue occurred within the context of Scoggins and Chrulski’s employment. Compare Albritton v. Gandy, 531 So.2d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). We reject respondents’ argument that the doctrine of absolute immunity is inapplicable because of the absence of a defamation claim.
Petition granted.
POLEN, STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palm Beach Cnty. Health Care Dist. v. Prof'l Med. Educ., Inc., 13 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…them. . We note that another panel of this court recently applied the doctrine of absolute immunity to bar an action for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship against a City and its employees. See City of Stuart v. Monds, 10 So. 3d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). This would be a separate ground supporting a judgment for the District on the tortious interference count. . This case does not fall within the exception to the general rule, where no civil wrong is the object of the conspiracy…
-
GAY v. Jupiter Island Compound, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)
-
Harrison v. Kimarie Stratos (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cassell v. India, 964 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Grady Albritton v. Gandy, 531 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Crowder v. Barbati, 987 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)