GIANCARLO FERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2009-05-06
No. 4D08-294
POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
8 So. 3d 491 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2009)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*492PER CURIAM.

Giancarlo Fernandez appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary of an occupied dwelling with assault or battery. Fernandez raises two issues on appeal. The first we affirm without discussion on the basis of Ferguson v. State, 417 So.2d 639 (Fla.1982). As to the second issue— that the trial court reversibly erred by permitting a lay witness to provide expert testimony regarding a shoe print left at the scene — we affirm because established Florida law has determined that such testimony may be presented by a lay witness. See Irvin v. State, 66 So.2d 288 (Fla.1953); White v. State, 375 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979.)

POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw