RICKY L. NEVELS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2009-04-15
No. 4D08-2997
GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
6 So. 3d 117 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).

We note that the record does not contain a formal judgment with appellant’s fingerprints affixed, as required by section 921.241(1), Florida Statutes (2007). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.986. Accordingly, we direct the trial court on remand to enter such a judgment. See Ramos v. State, 429 So.2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (affirming conviction and sentence, but vacating judgment and sentence order and remanding for entry of a proper judgment).

Affmned but remanded for entry of formal judgment.

GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. State, 403 So. 3d 354 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
    …1st DCA 2022) (citing Jones v. State, 569 So. 2d 1234, 1238 (Fla. 1990) (finding “no merit” to claim for relief based on trial judge’s failure to affix defendant’s fingerprints to judgment of guilt as required by section 921.241)); Nevels v. State, 6 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Ramos v. State, 429 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (affirming Dismissed. conviction and sentence, but vacating judgment without fingerprints affixed and remanding for entry of formal judgment)).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw