THOMAS L. CRAMER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2009-03-27
No. 5D08-4240
PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
5 So. 3d 790 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Thomas L. Cramer’s motion to correct sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In reviewing the sentencing documents, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment of Cramer’s Case No. 99-2987. Although the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly indicates that the sentence in Case No. 99-2987 was to be served consecutively to the other sentences imposed at the same time, the written judgment fails to reflect that fact. On remand, a corrected sentencing document *791shall be prepared and a copy forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw