CLARENCE BROTHERS, PETITIONER,
v.
WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-01-30
No. 1D08-2805
WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
1 So. 3d 378 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Brothers seeks review of a final order denying his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged the calculation of gain-time. We grant respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding as moot. Because official records indicate that Mr. Brothers was released from prison during the pendency of this proceeding, the proceeding is moot. See Phillips v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hill v. Dixon (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
    …PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Brothers v. McNeil, 1 So. 3d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Because official records indicate that Mr. Brothers was released from prison during the pendency of this proceeding, the proceeding is moot.”). LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not fina…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw