UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A/A/O RAQUEL GUTIERREZ, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prevailing Party On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez’s confession of error, we grant petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company’s Petition for Writ of Certioriari. Respondent agrees with petitioner that the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, acting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of the law when it awarded respondent appellate attorney’s fees and costs. The respondent was not the prevailing party in the trial court. Pursuant to Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Company, 944 So.2d 252 (Fla.2006), an appellate court cannot award appellate attorney’s fees to an insured unless the insured prevails on appeal.
Therefore, we conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in this case in granting the fees and costs to respondent. We thus grant the petition and quash the order granting these conditional fees and costs to respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lopez, 7 So. 3d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…Our own case law, post -Brass & Singer, has reiterated the command of our high court that the word “prevails” means “prevails.” See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Perez, 990 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Med. Group, Inc., 1 So. 3d 365, 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“[A]n appellate court cannot award appellate attorney’s fees to an insured unless the insured prevails on appeal.”).1 It is also apodictic that the failure to follow “clearly established law,” including “recent controlling c…
Authorities Cited
- Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 944 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2006)