MURPHY SINCLAIR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MURPHY SINCLAIR, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
994 So. 2d 1247
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant-appellant Murphy Sinclair states that he was sentenced to twenty years as a habitual felony offender with a fifteen-year minimum mandatory sentence as a prison releasee reoffender. This sentence is a legal sentence. See Ducksworth v. State, 834 So. 2d 951, 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (sentence of life in prison as a habitual violent felony offender with concurrent thirty-year minimum mandatory sentence as a prison releasee reof-fender is a legal sentence).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murphy Sinclair v. State, 65 So. 3d 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…fteen years as a PRR. Therefore, the trial court did not violate the PRR Act. Further, this Court previously held that Sinclair’s twenty-year sentence as a HFO and fifteen-year sentence as a PRR was in fact a legal sentence. See Sinclair v. State, 994 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Accordingly, we affirm.…
Authorities Cited
- Ducksworth v. State, 834 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)