ELLIOT ANTONIO MCNEIL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2008-01-25
No. 2D07-4732
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and STRINGER, JJ., concur.
993 So. 2d 1030 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Elliot Antonio McNeil appeals the post-conviction court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). To resolve Mr. McNeil’s claim requires factual determinations that are not apparent from the face of the record. Therefore, this claim may not be raised by a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Blocker v. State, 968 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 973 So. 2d 1119, No. SC07-2292, 2007 WL 4864232 (Fla. Dec. 21, 2007).

Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction court’s denial order without prejudice to any right Mr. McNeil might have to file a timely and facially sufficient sworn motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Any such motion will not be deemed successive.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and STRINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • M.N. v. State, 16 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …involuntary because he was led to believe he could appeal the denial of his motion to continue, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right M.N. might have to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See D.E.R. v. State, 993 So. 2d 1030, 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Affirmed without prejudice to M.N.’s right to file a timely petition for writ of habeas corpus. CASANUEVA, C.J., and ALTENBERND, FULMER, WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, DAVIS, KELLY, VTLLANTI, WALLACE, LaROSE, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, J…
  • D.M. v. State, 84 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
    …h it might seem that D.M. is caught in a Catch 22,1 he is not. A juvenile wishing to challenge the voluntariness of a plea may do so by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See T.G., 800 So. 2d at 213; D.E.R. v. State, 993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); J.M.B., 750 So. 2d at 655. Thus, instead of moving to withdraw his pleas, D.M. could have preserved the question of whether his pleas were voluntary by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. And instead of denying D.M.’s…
  • State v. S.S., 40 So. 3d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.140. We disagree. As the State acknowledges, a juvenile can challenge the voluntariness of a plea by petition for -writ of habeas corpus. See, e.g., State v. T.G., 800 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001); D.E.R. v. State, 993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Further, rule 8.140 allows a juvenile to move for relief from an order, judgment or proceeding for a number of reasons, including: (1) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. (2) Newly discovered evidence which by…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw